Though syntactic Agreement is generally assumed to be local, there are many morphological agreement patterns which are sensitive to person hierarchies. A strand of previous work has analyzed patterns of this type using a constraint—Best Match—which forces a probe to Agree with the goal that will value the highest number of its features (e.g., Oxford, 2019). This paper proposes a reformulation of Best Match that leverages the decomposition of Agreement into two component operations: Match and Value (Chomsky, 2000). Match is stricly local and identifies goals which can value the probe; Valuation occurs late and copies features onto the probe from the matched goal which will value the most features of the probe. The proposal is motivated and demonstrated using a pattern of A-bar movement in Mixtec: though both wh-words and foci must move to the clausal periphery, wh-words will always move across a more local focus. The paper analogizes this effect to more familiar person hierarchy effects within the A-domain, and argues that analyzing movement, in addition to morphological agreement, helps advance understanding of the precise mechanisms of Agreement.