Puyuma, an understudied western Austronesian language, demonstrates the compatibility of Philippine-type and Indo-European-type voice alternations within the same clause. This compatibility is surprising under the traditional view that Philippine-type voice instantiates valency-indicating morphology hosted within VoiceP, akin to Indo-European-type voice. Drawing on novel data from Puyuma, we show that the compatibility of the two voice systems is in fact expected, as only the latter (Indo-European-type voice) constitutes a true case of voice alternation hosted in Voice; Philippine-type voice is encoded in a projection external to VoiceP, and shows the hallmarks of topic agreement encoded in the left periphery. This conclusion lends novel support to a family of A-bar agreement approaches to Philippine-type voice (Chamorro: Chung 1994; Malagasy: Pearson 2005; Tagalog: Chen 2017), and argues against an alternative ergative analysis (Mithun 1994; Aldridge 2004 et seq.), which draws on the opposite assumption that Philippine-type voice realizes Voice/applicative heads hosted within the core verbal domain.