All proceedings
Enter a document #:
Enter search terms:

Info for readers Info for authors Info for editors Info for libraries Order form Shopping cart

Share Paper 2686

PCC and Ergative Case: Evidence from Neo-Aramaic
Edit Doron and Geoffrey Khan
46-53 (complete paper or proceedings contents)


The paper adduces evidence for the morphological ergativity of all Neo-Aramaic dialects of the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA) group, a Semitic language spoken by Jewish and Christian communities originating in the border areas of Turkey, Iraq, and Iran. We show that determining the ergativity of a language cannot be based automatically on the marking of the intransitive subject as different from the transitive subject. Some NENA dialects are Extended-Ergative; i.e., they mark intransitive and transitive subjects alike. Yet these subjects have other characteristics that distinguish them, and therefore Extended-Ergative dialects should be considered ergative, not nominative-accusative. The marking of the intransitive subject as object is but one characteristic of ergativity, albeit the best known one. Ergativity should be judged by the totality of the ergativity syndrome, of which agreement reversal and subject drop are important symptoms. According to our findings, ergativity is a wider phenomenon than has generally been recognized.

Published in

Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
edited by Jaehoon Choi, E. Alan Hogue, Jeffrey Punske, Deniz Tat, Jessamyn Schertz, and Alex Trueman
Table of contents
Printed edition: $375.00