All proceedings
Enter a document #:
Enter search terms:

Info for readers Info for authors Info for editors Info for libraries Order form Shopping cart

Bookmark and Share Paper 1652

Processing Ellipsis: A Processing Solution to the Undergeneration Problem?
Lyn Frazier
21-32 (complete paper or proceedings contents)


Syntactic accounts of ellipsis require an elided constituent to have a syntactically matching antecedent at LF. Such accounts undergenerate. Many attested examples of ellipsis do not contain a completely parallel antecedent for the elided constituent. A processing approach to this undergeneration problem will be proposed: when the discourse does not contain a matching antecedent for an elided constituent, the processor builds one at LF using the materials at hand (Arregui, Clifton, Frazier and Moulton, 2006). On this approach, some instances of ellipsis will be acceptable even though there is no pre-existing matching antecedent simply because the processor can create one at LF using its normal mechanisms, e.g., those needed for performing syntactic reanalysis of garden path sentences. Non-matching antecedents of elided constituents are claimed to be particularly acceptable when they correspond to natural speech errors (syntactic blends) and when they instantiate contrasts set up by a non-actuality implicature.

Published in

Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
edited by Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie
Table of contents
Printed edition: $375.00