|
List of proceedings Info for readers Info for authors Info for editors Info for libraries Order form Shopping cart |
The Syntax-Lexicon Interface in the Acquisition of English Comparative Morphology Koichi Otaki 96-103 (complete pdf) This paper investigates the acquisition of two types of comparative adjectives in English (synthetic comparatives with -er and periphrastic comparatives with more). Graziano-King (1999) observed that English-speaking children aged four tended to prefer periphrasitic comparatives when asked which comparative form of gradable adjectives sounded better, and concluded that (1) periphrasitic comparatives are the default option: more is inserted as a last resort, to save a stranded comparative morpheme ('CMPR'), and (2) once synthetic comparatives are listed in the lexicon, by virtue of positive evidence, they block periphrastic comparatives. To check whether English-speaking children prefer periphrastic comparatives in their spontaneous speech as well, spontaneous-speech data from four English-speaking children in the CHILDES database (Abe, Adam, Sarah, and Naomi) were analyzed. It was found that (1) when comparative forms were produced, they were always synthetic comparatives (not a single periphrastic comparative was produced), and (2) the children did not use the synthetic comparatives together with than-clauses until relatively late. The results suggest that the lexicon of English-speaking children around age four lacks CMPR, and that the synthetic comparatives children produce are not true comparatives. Published in: Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop edited by Michael Iverson, Ivan Ivanov, Tiffany Judy, Jason Rothman, Roumyana Slabakova, and Marta Tryzna Table of contents ISBN 978-1-57473-437-9 library binding v+122 pages publication date: 2010 published by Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA, USA |